Thunderball. First true Bond Juggernaut.

After the massive success that was Goldfinger, and the Bond character being so firmly established in the public consciousness, it was time to take it to another level; a more lavish one.

Thunderball would become the first movie in the series to become a true artistic and financial Juggernaut. But the road to its production was a rocky one, to say the least.


Thunderball had originally been conceived as a screenplay for the big screen, for which Ian Fleming enlisted the help of producer Kevin McClory, and screenwriter Jack Whittingham. The proyect went nowhere, and after languishing for some time in a drawer, Fleming took the material up again, and turned it into a successful novel.

When both McClory and Whittingham learned of this, they took Fleming to court, which failed in favour of them in that they were entitled to a writing credit for the book, since they had suggested, or outright come up with most of the ideas that would later be used by Fleming in the novel.

When Harry Saltzman took up an option to adapt Fleming’s books to the big screen, and would later do so after forming a partnership with producer Albert R. Broccoli, he had every intention of adapting Thunderball as the first ever Bond adventure to get the big screen treatment. Given the rights issues in which said property was embroiled, he and Broccoli had to desist, which would prove to be a blessing in disguise in the long run, as the scale of the production was too big and ambitious to be given justice with a small budget, as the first Bond movie, Dr No had been.

After coming to a agreement with both McClory and Whittingham, to give the first a producer’s credit, and the second a writing credit, the production was green lit, and ready to move ahead. Terrence Young came back into the fold for what would be his last Bond movie as director. It was only fitting that the man who pretty much breathed life into Bond to become a fully fledged cinematographic character would return, once again, to helm the most ambitious and lavish movie of the series to date, and the first one that would usher Bond into the realm of the Cinemascope format.

This would not be the end of the story, though, as years later McClory, still holding the rights for the Thunderball story, and with the help of producer John Schwarzman and Warner Bros., produced in 1983 a remake of Thunderball with the title Never Say Never Again, directed by Irvin Kershner, fresh off directing The Empire Empire Strikes Back, and Sean Connery reprising his role as 007. This unofficial entry in the series would clash directly with the official installment in the by then, exclusively produced Broccoli Bond movies, and the sixth with Roger Moore in the role of 007; Octopussy. Octopussy would ultimately prevail in the box office showdown, despite the McClory produced movie making a profit.

The Old Guard is back

With Terrence came back the old troop of both actors and crew, who had practically become a mainstay in the series since its inception. Bernard Lee, Lois Maxwell, Desmond Llewellyn and of course, the man himself Sean Connery, all returned. So did most of the technical and creative team behind the previous entries like Editor Peter Hunt, Cinematographer Ted Moore, Production Designer Ken Adam and Composer John Barry.

Writer Richard Maibaum came back, once again, to pen the script, this time with the help of fellow screenwriter John Hopkins, who’d been hired by Saltzman to work on the script for Funeral in Berlin, the next installment in the Harry Palmer series made famous by actor Michael Caine. Unfortunately for him, and against the advise of many of his fellow crewmen, he decided to stay behind in London, working on both scripts, instead of going to the Bahamas, where most of the crew was, thus missing out on the fun.

And some new faces

Some new blood, as always, was required to play Bond’s new romantic interest and some of the most iconic villains and villainess the series has had. First off, Italian actor Adolfo Celi would play the role of Emilio Largo, number 2 in the criminal organization Spectre, and the mastermind behind the plan of stealing two nuclear weapons and ransom NATO for them, Luciana Paluzzi, who had auditioned for the role of Domino, Largo’s mistress and Bond’s new romantic interest, played the role of ruthless SPECTRE henchwoman Fiona Volpe. The role of Domino fell on French actress and former Miss France, Claudine Auger, whilst Young’s old acquaintance from previous casting sessions for the two first movies, Martine Beswick, landed the role of Paula, Bond’s MI6 assistant in Nassau, British actor Guy Doleman played Count Dippe, another one of SPECTRE’S operatives with whom Bond has a near-fatal encounter in the recovery clinic Shrublands concerning a certain spine stretching contraption, Rick Van Nutter took over the role of Felix Leiter from actor Cec Linder from Goldfinger. His was supposed to be a recurring appereance for the next movies, and was actually contracted to do so, but being as it was that the character would not show up for the next two movies, when the time came for Van Nutter to reprise his role, he was engaged in other projects, and would never reprise the role again. Another interesting piece of casting was that of Molly Peters, who plays the role of Pat, the nurse who takes care of Bond in Shrublands, and who is the first object of Bond’s sexual attentions in the movie. With all the elements in place, it was time to bring about, in record time, what would be one of the most costly and difficult shoots in the series to date. A challenge compounded by the fact that a good chunk of the movie would take place underwater.

Under pressure

The shoot would prove to be one of the most challenging of the entire series. There were 4 Units shooting at the same time in the Bahamas, Florida, France and Pinewood Studios, UK. Most of Ken Adam’s lavish sets were painstakingly recreated at Pinewood Studios and Ricou Browning, an expert, along with his partner Jordan Klein Sr in underwater filming, who had devised a retrofitted camera for shooting underwater, were in charge of filming all the underwater scenes, of which there were many.

Most of the Scuba diving equipment that Largo’s SPECTRE crew uses during the Vulkan plane hijack and to move from the Disco Volante to the underwater hideout were the bombs are placed, was designed in London and then assembled in location in the Bahamas. There was such a wealth of material shot for the underwater sequences that the first rough cut of the movie ended up with a running time of over 4 hours, which proved to be so something of a challenge for editor Peter Hunt to trim down to a running time of a little over two hours. Young wasn’t very fond of this aspect of the film, and thought that the excessive amount of scenes that took place underwater slowed the movie down considerably. Nevertheless, the underwater sequences, especially the final underwater battle scene, proved to be one of the most outstanding features of the movie, and one of the reasons why this movie in particular is so fondly remembered by most fans.

A scene that takes place in a Shark-filled salt water pool, and the use of live Sharks for practically the whole of the production, was a major cause of concern for most over the stunt men, actors and crew, due to their unpredictable nature. A plexiglass wall was erected inside the pool to separate the actor from the Sharks for the scene in which Bond falls into the pool after fighting one of Largo’s minions when he goes to Largo’s estate to try and rescue Paula. Unfortunately, due to a shortage of plexiglass, the wall was shortened, thus allowing one of the sharks to slip through, causing a near-fatal incident between Connery and the predator. For some of the underwater sequences, like the final Battle, the sharks had to be tethered by the crew to be made to move around whenever needed. However, most of them would slip out of their restraints and escape, forcing the underwater crew to go after them, to try and capture them again. Aside from these problems, the weather and shooting conditions were mostly benign for most of the shoot.

Another logistical nightmare was the Junkanoo parade sequence, a sort of local Mardi Grass, in which Bond uses the mayhem and crowds to evade capture by Largo’s men. It’s a very colourful sequence that the producers thought would be the perfect chance to showcase Nassau, and their traditions. The sequence was completed with the help of hundreds of local extras that, for two nights of shooting in a row gave it their all, even causing some consternation to the crew when some of the extras showed up wearing the logo 007 emblazoned on their costumes.

Other standout set pieces are the Disco Volante, Largo’s retrofitted yacht/moving base of operations that splits in half during the movie’s climax with the front part speeding away. It’s also equipped with an underwater hatch under the keel to conceal the Nuclear weapons and transport them to a cleverly concealed underwater hideout. SPECTRE’s Parisian secret conference room with its array of moving electric chairs, Q’s base of operations in Nassau and MI6 conference/war room were all meticulously recreated in Pinewood Studios. Having such a large budget at his disposal, allowed Ken Adam to let fly his imagination without any restrictions.

Box office performance

The movie was a worldwide runaway success, breaking box office records all around the globe, and it became, and stood for a long time, along with Goldfinger, as one of the most profitable movies in the series, and one that would cause the spy craze and everything related to the Bond property to become a hot market commodity. The marketing campaign for the movie was extensive, and the sells of merchandise like toys, articles of clothing and books went to the roof.

Final thoughts

Not as grounded in reality as his two previous Bond-helmed movies had been, Thunderball is nonetheless a very enjoyable and entertaining entry in the series. It ticks all the right boxes; a charismatic and somewhat sadistic villain, his duplicitous and resourceful henchwoman, a stunning-looking, but at the same time strong female lead, a very well put together plot, beautifully striking sets and locales, exciting action sequences, and a wonderful music score to top it all off. John Barry delivers here one of his strongest scores for the series, even though the main title song by Shirley Bassey; “Kiss Kiss Bang Bang”was never used at the insistence of the producers of having a main title song with the movie title in it. The song was re-arranged and worked around the movie’s title, but time would prove with subsequent Bond title songs whose lyrics couldn’t be worked around the title, and working nonetheless, that it was the wrong call; especially considering how uninspired the resulting song sang by Tom Jones would end up being. The script is well written, despite the on-screen execution being somewhat meandering, and Editor Peter Hunt was, once again on point with his very dynamic and innovative editing style, that came to the fore in the action set pieces. A combination of quick cuts and sped-up footage made for some very fast moving, but comprehensive fight scenes. Ken Adam was his usual brilliant self, delivering some of the most inventive and innovative sets in the series, now without the hurdle of a restrained budget.

Connery was fully settled in the role at this point, and plays the part effortlessly. The same thing can be said about all the other recurring actors. As for the main villain Emilio Largo, Adolfo Celi does a wonderful job perfectly conveying with his voice and body language a sense of threat that always seems to be simmering below the surface, ( even if the Italian actor, like his fellow actress Luciana Paluzzi, and the French speaking Claudine Auger had their lines dubbed over in Post-production). Even though Claudine Auger does a decent turn as Domino, it was really Luciana Paluzzi who delivered the best performance as the “bad” Bond girl of the piece, and seems to genuinely be having fun with the part. This may be in part due to the level of complicity that Young would develop with his leading ladies on set, to the point that he would remain friends with all of them years after they had worked together.

Some of the action set pieces, like Bond’s face-off against SPECTRE’s number 6, colonel Jaques Bouvar are superbly choreographed and executed, whilst others, like most of the underwater action set pieces, especially the final underwater Battle sequence, would go on for a tad too long. And that’s my main gripe with the movie. It moves at a brisk enough pace for the first half of the movie, but once Bond arrives to Nassau to try and find where the bombs are hidden, everything slows down considerably. A complaint voiced by director Terrence Young, once the final cut of the movie had been finalized. Unlike Goldfinger, whose running time breezes past without you noticing it, this movie is not only one of the longest entries in the series, but one with seriously glaring issues when it comes to its pacing, something that I think is due to the use and abuse of its underwater sequences. In my opinion, a good 10 min could have been trimmed out of it. That being said, and in true Terrence Young’s fashion, the final product is a well thought out, and executed spy adventure that lives long in the memories of its fans despite its flaws. Incidentally, this was the first ever time that Connery had the chance to shoot the gun barrel sequence for the pre-credit opening sequence, something that up until that point, stuntman Bob Simmons had done. And in Cinemascope, no less.

Thanks for reading.

Goldfinger. The James Bond movie that broke molds.

This review contains spoilers

Even though the United Artist-produced 007 movies were already making waves in the box office of cinemas the world over, with only two movies out at the time; Dr No and From Russia with Love, it was certainly Goldfinger that would establish itself, not only as a cinematic landmark, in terms of artistic and box office success, but also as the James Bond movie that would forever etch the name of Bond, James Bond into the public consciousness, and would definitely lay out the blue print from which all other James Bond movies would be molded after.


Given the success that producer Albert R. Broccoli and Harry Saltzman had had with director Terence Young, they tried to recruit him, once again, to take over filming of the next installment of the saga. Young would end up abandoning the proyect due to creative differences, but was quickly replaced by Guy Hamilton, with whom Broccoli had worked before, and already knew Sean Connery socially before he became famous for playing 007.

Guy Hamilton’s style was quite different from that of Terence Young’s in that he wanted to play the tongue-in-cheek elements of both the character and story more strongly, and do away with the more down-to-earth and realistic approach used by Young on the two previous entries. He also pushed for the use of more comedic elements and one-liners, that would become one of the hallmarks of the series. One example of this was the pre-credit sequence, in which Bond, after blowing up an opium factory, slips out of a wet suit to reveal an impeccable white tuxedo underneath, with no creases to speak of, and a red rose to pin on his jacket lapel. That immediately informs the audience of what type of movie they’re in for, and that the tone of it is going to be a drastic departure from what had be seen on the previous two movies.

Most of the recurring cast members; like Bermard Lee as M, Lois Maxwell as Miss Moneypenny and Desmond Llewellyn as Q were back, once again. It was now only a matter of finding the right actors and actresses to portray the role of the main villains and Bond girls.

For the role of the main villain of the piece, Auric Goldfinger, German actor Gert Fröbe was chosen after the filmmaker and producers had seen Fröbe playing the role of a child molester in a German film. His menacing physical presence would prove to be an asset when it came to showing the devious nature of the character, but there was one major drawback that would drive the producers over the edge when they learned of it; Fröbe couldn’t speak a word of English. Guy Hamilton got around this by having the actor learn to speak the words phonetically as fast as he could, so it would be easier later on to dubb him over. The end result was perfect and if I hadn’t found out about it, I would be none the wiser.

Shirley Eaton would land one of the most iconic Bond girl roles of the entire saga, and would be the protagonist of one of the most beautifully eerie moments of the series; the sequence in which Bond after having been knocked out cold by Goldfinger’s henchman; Oddjob, awakens to discover the naked body of Shirley Eaton’s Jill Masterson covered entirely in gold paint. It’s one of the most eye-catching, and instantly recognizable scenes of the whole saga. It was a role that would also give further legs to her aspirations of becoming an actress in Hollywood as, up until then, she’d been relegated to play roles in some small produced British comedies, like the “Carry On” movies. For the role of her vengeful sister Till Masterson, model Tania Mallet was chosen. Clearly a very inexperienced actress, her role in the film was very minor and reduced to begin with, ending abruptly with her death at the hands of Oddjob, halfway through the movie.

But the one actress who would end up playing the main Bond girl role of the movie and a very controversial one at that, from a censorship point of view, was British actress Honor Blackman. She had been a mainstay of the famous 60s spy thriller The Avengers, which run from 1961 to 1969. The origin of this controversy was because of the apparent lurid nature of the name chosen for her character, a name that was already present in Ian Fleming’s book; Pussy Galore. Despite the numerous attempts by censors at the time to stop the producers from using the name, or even trying to convince them to pick another one ( reference to the character’s name were even removed from the promotional material used to market the movie worldwide), the producers, and especially Blackman were adamant in using the name whenever they could, as she thought it to be just another tongue-in-cheek element inseparable from the funny and over-the-top tone of the movie. Her time in The Avengers, and experience practising Judo for the action sequences on that show, would also prove to be a major asset when playing her character. The sassy, irreverent and highly independent nature of her character, would transform her into one of the most memorable and beautiful Bond girls to grace the big screen.

For the role of Goldfinger’s henchman, the Korean bodyguard Oddjob, the producers went with Hawaiian Wrestler from Japanese descent, Harold Sakata. The producers were impressed by the sheer size, and physique of the wrestler turned actor, who with his lethal steel-pointed bowler hat, would become one of the most memorable villains/henchman of the series.

Other actors would be Cec Linder as CIA agent Felix Leiter and Michael Mellinger as Kisch, another one of Golfinger’s henchmen.

With the cast pretty much in place, most of the technical and artistic crew like editor Peter Hunt, Cinematographer Ted Moore, Production Designer Ken Adam, Film Composer John Barry and writer Richard Maibaum with the collaboration of writer Peter Dehn this time, would return to familiar territory, but with a much increased budget of $3 million, that would help Adam come up with some of the most lavishly constructed sets for the series, like Goldfinger’s Swiss hideout, the Laser-Beam room, his briefing room that also serves as gassing chamber for those Goldfinger wants to get rid of, and especially, his highly inventive recreation of the interior of Fort Knox, access to which was impossible for the producers, who had to make do with Adam’s imagination. John Barry would also come up with one of his most energetic and inventive scores for the series, for which he was in total control this time around, delivering at the same time one of the most iconic and memorable title songs for the saga, sang by the inimitable Shirley Bassey with lyrics by Barry, Leslie Bricusse and Anthony Newley.


Filming took place in location in Miami, Switzerland and Kentucky, US, with the bulk of the production being filmed, once again in the UK, in Pinewood Studios. As Sean Connery was still busy filming the movie Marnie (Alfred Hitchcock, 1964), at the time main unit started filming Goldfinger, the filmmakers had to be very clever in the way they shot in some of the locations ( The Fontainebleu Hilton Resort in Miami, or a Car Factory that doubled up as Auric Goldfinger’s Swiss smelting factory), using some of these scenes as background plates that would later on be used as background proyection for the same sets recreated in Pinewood Studios. It was the clever melding of both of these elements in the editing room by Peter Hunt, that would help the production team keep up the shooting schedule without a hitch. One of the most remarkable elements of the movie was the extensive use of gadgets, that would become one of the mainstays and sources of popularity for the series. None was more popular than the use of the Aston Martin DB5, a car model that would replace the Bentley that Bond drove in the novels, and which offered the Art Department the chance to let their imaginations run wild, and load the car with all sorts of gadgetry that would help Bond get out of any sticky situation. Among the most famous gadgets implemented were; machine guns behind the headlights, revolving plate numbers, smoke screen, slick oil that came out of the car’s tail lights, a bulletproof shield that sprung up from behind the car, and an ejector seat. More gadgets were supposed to be implemented, like a hidden compartment for guns under the passenger seat and a car phone, to name just a few. But the Art Department didn’t, unfortunately, have the time to fit all of them into the car in time for filming. One of the main hurdles into which filmmaker and producers run, when wrapping up filming in the States, was the impossibility of filming around and inside the Gold depository of Fort Knox. As it was a highly restrictive area, into which not even the President of the United States was allowed, Broccoli resorted to a military friend of his to get around this by taking pictures of the outside and getting away with some guerrilla filmmaking when it came to shooting the air raid around Fort Knox by Pussy Galore’s Flying Circus. The planes were piloted by expert crop dusters outfitted with blonde wigs to make them look like Pussy Galore’s flying squad. For the sequence in which hundreds of soldiers camped around Fort Knox fall to the ground as Pussy’s flying squad fly over them, they convinced the different soldier units to do it on command on the promise of some money and beer. It was a monumental logistical task that paid off. As for the rest of the sequence taking place both outside and inside Fort Knox, the Art Department under the direction of Ken Adam recreated both sets on the back lot and inside some of the biggest stages of Pinewood. It was a great achievement in Production Design, and stretched the imagination of those working in the Art Department to the limit.


Goldfinger was an inmediate success. It was the fastest grossing movie of its time, and one of the most successful of the entire series. It also inspired a spy craze that would spawn an unlimited amount of movies that would directly benefit from the success of the Bond movies, some with more fortune than others, but none would come even close to what Goldfinger had achieved. It would even prove to be a difficult task, years down the line, for the producers to top their own product with successive movies. It is a hallmark entry in the series, and one of the most entertaining and tightly edited movies of the saga. A movie that broke molds and set the standard for what was to come.

Final Thoughts

Goldfinger is a brilliant example of what a Bond movie is supposed to be like. It’s got it all; a compelling and charismatic villain, kick-ass henchman, beautiful but, at the same time, resourceful Bond girls, an outlandish, but very well put together plot, great gadgets, brilliant action set-pieces, and a great score. There’s not a dull moment during the whole movie, it’s tightly edited, even though the blend of in location and on-set footage is not always seamless, and some of the continuity errors are quite glaring. So is the end of the movie. The scene in which Bond fights off Goldfinger in the depresurized cabin of a plane, and ends up with Goldfinger being sucked out of the window, is laughable at best. If you can overlook these technical and writing issues, you should be in for a treat. Bond movies were never supposed to be grounded in reality to begin with. The world of Bond is one of fantasy, and the elements and characters surrounding him are supposed to be outlandish and over-the-top. Sean Connery is clearly at his most comfortable as James Bond in this movie. His performance is flawless, and his blend of hard-edge attitude, and tongue-in-cheek sense of humour, would forever define the main character traits of any Bond. If you’ve never seen a Bond movie, this would be the one to go for first.

Thanks for reading.

The King of Comedy. The tragedy of life

The irony of being a great admirer of Martin Scorsese’s work over the years, and having never before seen The King of Comedy, doesn’t escape me, and it’s a tragedy in itself. Made all the more unforgivable, as this is probably one of his most rounded pictures, and probably the best of De Niro’s performances for the great filmmaker, and one of the most nuanced of his whole career.

It tells the story of Rupert Pupkin, played by Robert De Niro, whose name, everybody around him, seems to misspell, or not even remember. Pupkin is an aspiring stand up comedian, who is a great admirer of popular TV show host and comedian, Jerry Langford (Jerry Lewis playing a very down, bitter, and irritable version of himself) . One night, after one of Jerry’s shows, and after successfully saving him from a stalker named Masha, played by Sandra Bernhard, he gets in Jerry’s car with him. Rupert asks Jerry for his help to start in the showbiz. Jerry reluctantly accepts to help him, and tell him to come by his office the next day. Rupert does, but is deflected by Jerry’s personal assistant, who after numerous visits by Rupert, finally gives in and accepts a tape with Rupert’s recorded material in order to get rid of him. After more unsuccessful attempts by Rupert to gain Jerry’s attention, he decides to kidnap Jerry with the help of Masha, and threatens to kill him unless he’s allowed to appear on Live TV as a special guest of Jerry’s show, and prove what he can do in front of the whole world.

It may seem a simple and straightforward story, but it’s got more wrinkles and nuances that it may appear at first sight. Don’t be fooled. Rupert’s attempts to become a stand up comedy star, are nothing more than an effort to escape the day to day drab that his life has become; and as we later on learn; a way of overcoming a tragically difficult upbringing, with bouts of alcoholism and child abuse. As he clearly states at the end of his Live monologue; “It’s best to be king for a day than a schmuck for life”. In other words; he rather go to prison for his crime than face a life of mediocrity, in the off chance of having his 15 min of fame.

In spite of the absurd amount of curb balls that life throws at him, Rupert remains an upbeat character for most of the movie. That is, until after an impromptu visit to Jerry’s country estate, he realizes that he’s not really respected or appreciated by anyone around him, least of all, Jerry. He realizes that he’s been given the run around by most everyone, and finally decides to take matters into his own hands, and do something about it. It is easy to see the references, and how director Todd Phillips took more than one page out of Scorsese’s book for his highly successful Joker (2019). Both Arthur and Rupert are aspiring stand up comedians, and they also want to escape the mediocrity of their daily struggles, and being acknowledged and respected as artists, but especially human beings. They both resort to violence to solve their problems, but in the case of Rupert, the results are strikingly different. Rupert is a softer, less morally damaged person than both Arthur Fleck or his counterpart in Taxi Driver, Travis Bickle, whose way of dealing with an equally afflicting problem as prostitution and human degradation, is to shoot his way out of it. The end result for both Rupert and Travis is surprisingly the same. In the end, it all works out for them. One way or another. Not so much for Arthur. And therein lies the difference.

As is the case with Taxi Driver (1976), and Raging Bull ( 1980), Robert De Niro delivers yet another amazing performance, arguably his best under Scorsese’s direction, and one of the finest of his career. His character can be both likable and irritable at the same time, which is something quite difficult to achieve, but a test that De Niro passes with flying colours. Another standout performance would be Sandra Bernhard’s turn as a wealthy, but highly unbalanced psycho fan, who is willing to do anything just to get close to the object of her desire, Jerry Langford.

This movie is Scorsese at his finest. No one can portray the dirty, gritty, but amazingly good looking urban landscape of New York quite the way he or Woody Allen do. It is, at the same time, an apt social comment on how uncaring life in the big city, and especially in Show business, can be. Helped by a very solid script, solid performances, and very nice Cinematography by Fred Schuler, this is one of Scorsese’s best. I’m just sorry it took me this long to see it.

Thanks for reading.

Parasite. Scraping for a living.

Parasite is one of the most interesting movies that came out last year, one that, given its limited release in Theaters, I wasn’t expecting to see. Ever since its release, the movie has been growing from strength to strength, thanks to strong word-of-mouth from audience, and excellent reviews throughout in the critic circles. Directed by Bong Joo-hoo, whose excellent Snowpiercer (2013), has more than one point in common with Parasite, this is one of the absolute best movies of last year.

It tells the story of a struggling Southkorean family who live huddled together in a below-street-level tiny apartment. None of the family members has a job that pays well, and they’ve learned to hustle and scrape their living through a string of bad paid part-time jobs that barely help them get by. The family is comprised of both parents and two young siblings, who due to their combined low-income, have been forced to forego their University studies. Opportunity presents itself when a friend of the family, a University student, tells the young son that he’s gonna be away for a while because of his studies, and wants his young friend to take over him as English tutor to the daughter of a very well-off family, who live in the rich part of town. On his friend’s good word-of-mouth, and an English title forged by his sister, the young boy ingratiates himself with the family, and soon enough will find a way to bring in his sister, masquerading as an Art Psychologist for the family’s rebellious little son. It is, in this fashion, that little by little, the entire family work their way into the rich family’s household using morally dubious, and pretty unsavoury tactics to replace the household’s stuff. But there is one more surprise in store for the family that no one was counting on. With huge doses of black comedy, the movie is an apt tale about how far ordinary people are willing to go, in order to not only improve their social status, but also to remain there once achieved. Roles are flipped more often than not, when we learned that, who we thought to be the victims of the story, are not as clear cut as we thought them to be. In a cutthroat society as the one we live in, it’s no surprise the lengths people will go to, to secure economic position. In the end, it’s all for naught, as those above us, that fabled society’s 15 % rich, will always stay on top of the food chain. There are ample visual references contrasting both families’ way of living, going back and forth between the slums where the protagonists live, and the rich part of town, where the rich family live. One is built in an haphazard fashing, to fit in as many people as possible, with no decent facilities or drainage system; the other neighbourhood is built on top of a hill, with state of the art facilities and drainage system. This reference will come into play later on in the movie, in a scene that will be the catalyst of what’s to ensue in the last act of the movie. Likewise, through carefully placed lines of dialogue throughout the movie, we also get a sense of the social, and cultural divide between both families. The patriarch of the family makes some rather cruel comments about the way the ”other half” lives, and smells. As I said, not as clear cut as we might think. Even though the rich family has an outlook of pleasantness and kindness about them, the manner in which most of the time they will deal with the family protagonist, is rather condescending, and callous. The twist halfway through the movie is yet more proof of the level is self-depravation most people have to go through in life just to keep on breathing. Food for thought, and a cruel, but at the same time, wickedly funny tale about the limits of Humanity’s self preservation.

Thanks for reading.

From Russia with Love: Bond is back with a vengeance.

Given the runaway success that Dr No had been, producers Albert R. Broccoli and Harry Saltzman were determined to build on that success right away, and immediately started working on the next Bond movie in the series, which will prove to be even more successful than the previous one.


The Ian Fleming book chosen to be adapted for the next movie was From Russia with Love. The book was written at a time when sell figures for the Ian Fleming spy novels were at an all time low. Fleming was so disillusioned with this, that he’d even considered killing off James Bond at the very end of that book. Indeed, Bond was put into hospital at the end of the novel after Rosa Kleeb had nearly killed him with one of her poisonous shoe blades. Author Raymond Chandler convinced him otherwise, and the fact that the book was included on a list of the then President of the United States’ John Fitzgerald Kennedy favourite books, only helped his case. It was the inclusion on this reading list, which was the determining factor in convincing both Broccoli and Saltzman that they had to adapt it next. Once again, screenwriter Richard Maibaum was brought in once again to pen the script. All other crew members, and most of the recurring characters from the previous movie were once again called upon with the exception of Peter Burton, who’d played the part of Q on Dr No, and was sadly unavailable to reprise his role, and Production Designer, Ken Adam, who was currently working with Stanley Kubrik on Dr Strangelove. Neither did Maurice Binder. The release schedule of the movie was so tight that there wasn’t any time left for Binder to do his usual elaborate credits sequence. Instead, the job fell on the shoulders of Canadian artist Robert Brownjohn, who had the idea of proyecting the credits of the crew and cast on the girl chosen to act on the credits sequence. Apparently this idea was suggested to Brownjohn after his wife walked in front of a slide proyector by mistake. Desmond Llewelyn took over as Q and pretty much for the remainder of the series until come The World is not Enough (1999), after which he was replaced by John Cleese, and Art Director Syd Cain would replace Adam, who would be back for the next entry in the franchise. Terence Young always considered From Russia with Love to be one of Fleming’s best, if not the best, of his books, and it would end up making for one of the more realistic, grounded and solid of the Bond movies ever released. After that, and with Guy Hamilton taking over for the next installment, the Bond series would definitely step into the realm of the outlandish and tongue-in-cheek adventures that would become the series’ hallmark.

With a director, technical crew and principal actors pretty much in place, it was time to start looking for the next Bond girl and the new villain or villains of the piece. For this they went with a former Beauty Contest participant, the italian Daniella Bianchi as Tatiana Romanova, with Austrian actress Lotte Lenya to play the part of SPECTRE operative Rosa Klebb, Robert Shaw as deadly assassin Red Grant, and Pedro Armendáriz as Head of Station T in Turkey, Ali Kerim Bey. The part of Ernst Stavros Bloefeld would be played in this movie, and the next directed by Terence Young, Thunderball (1965), by actor Anthony Dawson, who’d played the role of Professor Dent in Dr No (1962), but would be voiced by another actor, Eric Pohlmann. Unlike in the book where the enemy against which Bond was facing off was the Russian organization SMERSH, the decision was made that they would be changed to SPECTRE, the criminal organization led by Ernst Stavros Bloefeld, that had been later on created by Ian Flemming, Jack Whittingham and Kevin McClory for the books, and would be the main point of contention in a legal dispute between Fleming and McClory over the legal use of said organazation in future films that ended up with McClory retaining the rights to use it, along with the rights to Fleming’s Thunderball novel.


Filming started in Instambul, Turkey, Scotland, Spain and Pinewood Studios, England, where the main sets like M’s office, Karim’s office, a replica of the Gypsy camp in Instambul, and above all, the interior of the Orient Express, which was meticulously recreated and, where one of the most tense and violent fist fights of the entire saga would take place. Other parts of Pinewood, like the garden area where the pre-credit sequence takes place, and which also doubles up as SPECTRE’s training camp.

The shoot would prove to be a difficult and strenuous proposition from the start, as the crew started having crowd control problems, and one of the main starts of the movie, Pedro Armendariz, was discovered to have developed an incurable type of Cancer that would only worsen during the first days of shooting. It was decided that Armendariz’s scenes would be pushed ahead in the schedule, so he could check himself into a hospital as soon as possible. It was thanks, in great part to Terence Young’s help, whose brother was the Queen of England’s surgeon, and was the one who treated Armendariz on the first stages of the sickness, and his quick and effective way of shooting, that the actor’s scenes could be finished promptly. There were also numerous re-writes done to the script by Maibaum during shooting, and thanks to the ingenious ideas of editor Peter Hunt, several scenes could be re-worked during the editing process, like the one where Rosa Klebb and Bloefeld discuss plans to steal the LECTOR decoding machine, where the footage of Lenya had to be reversed, and a re-shot shot of the actress placed in front of an existing one from a previous scene, and the background replaced by a background plate of the same location and used as back proyection. Those were the kind of tricks Hunt and co had to employ to save time and money. With other scenes, however, they weren’t so lucky. Even considering the difficulty of the helicopter chase scene that was shot in Scotland with a mixture of Live footage and miniatures, the boat chase scene, where Bond escapes a small flotilla of SPECTRE’s speed boats using barrels of Kerosene and a flare gun, had to be re-shot after an untimely explosion of the charges that Special Effects Supervisor John Stears had set to go off at the very end of the scene. That, and bouts of seasickness by actress Daniella Bianchi, forced Young and his team to re-schedule the shoot to be done in a water tank in one of Pinewood’s sets. The fight scene between Bond and Grant aboard the Orient Express was another cause for concern from a censorship point of view. There were concerns that the scene would be pulled out due to the considerable violent nature of it but, it was so expertly shot by Young, and performed by both Connery and Shaw ( the stuntmen for both actors were used in one small shot only), that they managed to get away with it. This was the very first time that Bond engineers his escape thanks to one of Q-Branch’s gizmos, a gas exploding suitcase with a concealed knife inside it, that would be the first of many gadgets to come in the series. It was actually the censors that would prove to be a bane in both the director’s and producers lives. Hunt was the one in charge of taking him around to the sets, and showing him the daillies at the end of the day, to make sure that everything was done according to Code regulations. Scenes, like the one where a model expertly concealed as Bianchi to shoot her nude scenes or the two gypsy women fight in the camp, the nature of which was way more graphic in the book, were so tastefully done that the Censors approved of them.

Final thoughts

This movie achieved the rare feat of improving on both the quality and the box office takings of the previous movie. It was a major success in most of Europe, and especially, the UK. Wasn’t as much of a runaway success as Dr No had been in the States, though, due, in the most part, to a limited theatrical release. It wouldn’t be until the release of the next movie in the franchise, Goldfinger (1964), that Bond would forever cement his place in Cinema History, and become the household name that it is today. The success of Goldfinger would prompt United Artist to re-release the first two Bond movies as a double bill, becoming one of the most profitable double bill features of all time. This, in my opinion, would really be the most hard edge we’d see Bond act in a movie until Licence to Kill (1989), and would see Daniel Craig continue in this fashion for most of his tenure, especially in Casino Royale (2006), and Skyfall (2012). It was also the last really grounded 007 adventure we’d see for a while.

In spite of the numerous re-writes that the script was subjected too, it’s by far, one of the tightest scripts in the franchise. The movie moves at a very swift pace, it’s got one of the more sadistic and effective enemies that Bond has ever faced in Red Grant, Lotte Lenya gives Rosa Klebb both the right amount of evil and coldness that the character needs, Connery is thoroughly immersed and comfortable in the role, Armendariz is one of the best Inteligence Community’s counterparts that Bond has ever had, and Bianchi, admittedly not the best of actresses, lights up the screen with her beauty. The action set pieces, like the fight between Grant and Bond aboard the Orient Express, the Helicopter chase sequence, and the Boat Chase sequence are all very well executed and brilliantly edited. As I mentioned on my previous Bond retrospective, John Barry really does come into his own in this movie, delivering a score that is both tense and melodic at times. His style would be further refined in the next entry in the series, Goldfinger (1964) . All in all, a thoroughly enjoyable spy movie, that shares some of the tropes, but bears little resemblance to what Bond movies would come to be later on. If I had to qualify Bond movies in regards to their faithfulness to the source material, I’d say this, and On Her Majesty’s Secret Service (1969) are the more faithful to Fleming’s writing. It’s by far the best of the three movies that were directed by Terence Young, and one of the most rounded and memorable of the entire saga. Scenes like the aforementioned Orient Express fight, the Gypsy Camp fight, the Boat Chase, and the highly suspenful last confrontation between Bond and Rosa Klebb and her poisonous concealed shoe blades, are among the best in the series. Connery was at his best on this one, and by the time Goldfinger came around, he’d already taken the world by storm, and became a household name overnight. James Bond was back with a vengeance. And was here to stay.

Thanks for reading.

Picard. Episode 1 review. Interesting beginning

Given the amount of bad press that this new TV show was getting even before it was released, I was somewhat skeptical about the quality of what I would find, when I finally got to see the first episode. Alas, all my qualms and misgivings have been put to rest. Even though the show resembles the look of the much derided Star Trek : Discovery show, as it apparently has most of the same creative team behind it; this one stays more true in spirit to what we remember Star Trek being.

The show has a very interesting premise. It picks up 20 years after the events of Star Trek: Nemesis, with a Jean Luc Picard retired to his vineyard and winery in France after, as we discover later on, resigning his commission as a Starfleet officer on account of a moral disagreement with the Federation, caused by a catastrophic event that forever changed the political landscape in the Galaxy. Soon enough, he gets embroiled once again in another difficult situation when a young woman, who claims to have some sort of connection to Picard’s past, comes knocking on his door, asking for help.

The interesting thing about this new TV show, without giving much away, is that the Federation as we once knew it, has been turned on its head, some new laws that affect characters loved by all of us have been passed, and a once mighty military, and economic force in the Galaxy, is no more. So far, on this first episode, we’ve only been given a few tidbits of information as to what happened, and we’ve been left wondering what’s gonna happen next. Which can only mean good things.

Needless to say, the show has amazingly good production values; Visual effects, Production design, Make-up and Costume design are still top notch. Not so sure about the music, though. I still think that Jeff Russo is not a good match for Star Trek. Surely they could’ve come up with a better Composer for the proyect. Michael Giacchino comes to mind. Patrick Steward slips right back into the role of Picard. He’s clearly grown more comfortable over the years as an actor, and is not as stiff as he used to be in the old days, due mainly to his background as a British stage actor for The London Shakespeare Company. He, like the wine produced from Picard’s winery, has got better with age. But, the absolute standout so far, is Isa Briones as Dahj. I’m really intrigued to see where they go with her character. On the few instances that she was onscreen, she managed the rare feat of making her completely believable, and compelling. They still need to work on the editing of the action scenes, as the quick cutting style they decided to go with, turn these into a jambled mess. As a said, an interesting beginning, with a promising plot, and engaging characters. Looking forward to seeing where they go with it.

Thanks for reading.

1917. Emotional Rollercoaster

Saying that 1917 is one of the best movies of 2020, which has barely started, is a bit of an understatement. This, without a shadow of a doubt, is one of the best movies of the last 10 years, and one that will probably make it onto the list of best movies of the 21st Century. It’s that good.

Taking a simple premise: Two soldiers in the middle of war-torn France during WWI, on April 6, 1917, are ordered by the High Command to cross the No Man’s land between the British forces and the German lines, to deliver the very important message of stopping an imminent attack by the British Army on a seemingly retreating German Army. The High Command knows, via some aerial footage, that the German have fortified their positions, and by apparently retreating, have lured the British forces into a false sense of security. They’ve also cut off all telephone lines, making it impossible for the British High Command to communicate the change in strategy to the front lines. So, it is up to these two young soldiers, Lance Corporal Blake, and Lance Corporal Schofield, to deliver the message without getting killed in the process.

Blake has personal stakes on the mission, as his brother happens to be one of the commanding officers in the front line in charge of leading the fateful offensive, and wants to get there as soon as possible to deliver the message, in spite of the overwhelming odds against them; while Schofield thinks is a foolish and dangerous endeavor to attempt crossing the enemy lines in broad daylight, and without the aid of either ground or aerial support.

What ensues is a classic war tale that plays out, most of the time, as an adventure story. To get to their final destination, they will have to overcome an ever increasing amount of obstacles in the form of underground hidden land mines, treacherous terrain, aerial dogfights, snipers, and enemy divisions hell-bent on killing them.

It’s a heartbreaking and, at times, very emotional tale of Hope and Loss, Friendship, and Sense of Duty. In the space of a brief series of exchanges between our main protagonists at the beginning of the movie, we get to know and care for them. It is mainly thanks to the performances of both Dean- Charles Chapman and George McKay, that we get really invested in both the characters, and the story being told. The journey is, ultimately, more important than the destination. Will they get there? Can they fulfill their mission?. We’re always on the edge of our seats, expecting the worst, but hoping for the best. Along the way, they will meet friends and foes, with some very surprising bit parts played by some of the best actors of the British scene like Mark Strong, Colin Firth, and Benedict Cumberbatch. And it is during these exchanges that we get to see the worst, but also the best that Mankind can offer. It’s not all black and white, there’s grays too. A lot of grey.

Being a filmmaker that I’ve been following with interest ever since his debut in American Beauty (1999), Sam Mendes has slowly, but surely, evolved into one of the most interesting filmmakers today. He’s honed and perfected his skills over the years, offering some of the best movies we’ve seen in the last twenty years, among them, one of the most rounded, and satisfying Bond movies we’ve seen in years, Skyfall (2012). It was during the making of that movie, and the next entry in the Bond series, Spectre (2015), that I believed he developed the skills the deliver one of the most amazing technical achievements that we’ve seen in recent cinematographic history. Deciding to shoot this movie as a one shot sequence, may be a marvel to behold, but it sure was no mean feat to accomplish, and it definitely must’ve been a logistical nightmare. He was helped in this task by brilliant British Cinematographer, Roger Deakins who has, once again, outdone himself with yet another Cinematography job that will surely earn him another deserved Oscar come Award season. Of course, if you look closely, and pay attention, you can see where the cuts are made, as it would be physically impossible to make a two-hour long one shot sequence, otherwise. But the cuts are so seamless, and so well made, that the magic spell is never broken. With a meticulously recreated war-torn landscape of trenches, wire fences, tunnels, mud, and amputated, and bloated corpses lying around for even more dramatic effect, thanks to a brilliant Production Design by Dennis Gassner, and a tense, but at times, majestic soundtrack by film composer and Mendes’ frequent collaborator, Thomas Newman, who sonically ratches up the suspense of the different action set pieces as the movie progresses; we are totally submerged in this experience.

A masterclass of suspense and war movie action, that will keep you nailed to your seat. I know I was. Unavoidable cinematic appointment of the year, and an absolute masterpiece for the ages. One of the absolutely best war movies ever made. Emotional Rollercoaster. Enough said. Don’t miss out.

Thanks for reading.

Dr No: Hello, Mister Bond.

In light of the upcoming release of the latest Bond movie on April 2nd of this year, I’ll be going over, and doing retrospective reviews on each, and every one of the movies that comprise the saga. So let’s start off with the movie that begun one of the most successful, and long running cinematic franchises in Cinema History.


When writer Ian Fleming published his first spy novel, Casino Royale (1953), which, for the first time, featured his womanizing, and cold blooded British secret agent with a licence to kill, James Bond; it was an immediate success. Many more novels would follow with Bond as the main protagonist. There was clearly an appetite for the exotic and, most times outlandish adventures of this secret agent, that faced the most dangerous foes, and surrounded himself with the most beautiful, and pleasing women. American Producer Albert R. Broccoli saw this property as the perfect source material upon which a long-running movie franchise could be built. At the time, Broccoli had formed a partnership with Producer Irwin Allen, with whom he shared his desire to buy the rights to this property from Ian Fleming. A meeting was set between Allen and Fleming with disastrous results, after Allen dismissed Fleming’s books as not even worthy of becoming a TV show. At the same time, another producer by the name of Harry Saltzman became interested in the property in the hopes of also adapting them to the big screen. He managed to buy the property for a limited period of six months, except the rights to Fleming’s first novel; Casino Royal, who belonged to someone else. He had this short period of time to start adapting the novels, or the rights would revert, once again, to Fleming. Broccoli learned of this deal and tried at first, unsuccessfully, to buy the rights from Saltzman, who otherwise convinced him to bring him in as a producing partner. They took the deal to MGM, who accepted under the condition that the movie be made with a budget of one million dollars. Both producers dissolved their previous partnerships, and formed their own production company; Eon Productions. The producers also realized that in order to appeal to American audiences, they would have to bring in a screenwriter with the right sensibilities towards that market, but who would also not deviate too much from the source material. Enter American screenwriter Richard Maibaum, who would become a mainstay for most of the series and who, thanks to his writing style, would shape the character into what it is today.

Finding the right Bond.

What was thought as a near impossible task of finding the right actor to play the role of James Bond, would turn out to be more straightforward than anticipated.

When Sean Connery was cast as James Bond, he was an actor with very limited acting experience. He’d played some bit parts here and there, in some British and American productions, and had previously worked with director Terence Young, who would be the man ultimately chosen by the producers to helm the proyect.

Connery came from a poor background, born and raised in Edinburgh, Scotland, he was described by both Young and the producers as a “diamond in the rough”. He had devilishly good looks, and a very strong physique thanks to his background in bodybuilding, but lacked the charm and class required for the role. It was up to Terence Young to build him up as James Bond. He took the actor to his personal tailor, and taught him all the mannerisms required to play the character succesfully. He basically taught him how to dress, talk and behave like Bond. By the time he was done, Young, who himself had all the attributes to play the role, had transformed Connery into the perfect James Bond. It was actually thanks to Young’s contributions that the foundations of what the James Bond character would develop into, were successfully laid out.

For the role of the first “Bond girl” proper, Swiss-German actress Ursula Andress was chosen. She was mainly cast on her looks, as she had very limited experience, and her thick German accent, which made it very difficult for her to be understood, would result in her lines being dubbed over in Post-production. In spite of that, her screen presence was undeniable, and through her physical performance her character came off as being both very sweet and resourceful at the same time.

For the part of the main villain, the producers went with Canadian actor Joseph Wiseman, who would have to wear heavy makeup to pass him off as Chinese mad scientist, working for the criminal organization SPECTRE, Dr No, and also very uncomfortable prosthetic metal hands as a result of the character’s dabbling with nuclear power.

For the other secondary roles, we have British stage actor Bernard Lee as M, Bond’s superior, and the Head of MI6, and who would end up reprising the role in another 10 movies until his death, Lois Maxwell as Miss Moneypenny, M’s secretary, and eternally pining for Bond’s attentions, who was another actress who’d previously worked with Terence Young, American actor Jack Lord played the part of CIA agent Felix Leiter, Anthony Dawson as Professor Dent, one of Dr No’s minions, and playing other bit parts we have British actress Zena Marshall as the very attractive, but lethal SPECTRE agent Miss Taro, who like Wiseman, had to wear heavy oriental makeup for the role, and also former Miss Jamaica, and airliner worker at the Kingston airport, Marguerite LeWars, who plays the part of a mysterious photographer who follows Bond around everywhere. Another important part would be played by British actress Eunice Grayson as Sylvia Trench, Bond’s first love conquest in the movie, whom he meets in the famous Casino sequence at the beginning of the movie, where Connery utters the now famous line; “My name is Bond, James Bond”, for the very first time. The actor chosen to play the part of Mayor Boothroyd, the Head of Q-Branch, was British actor Peter Burton, who sadly became unavailable for the next movie in the series; From Russia with Love, falling the role on Desmond Llewelyn for the next entry, and who’d end up playing Q as far as The World is not Enough (1999), Pierce Brosnan’s penultimate movie as James Bond.


Fiming started on 16 January 1962 in Jamaica. The production was plagued by bad weather, and other logistical issues. They had very little money to play with, and the budget constraints led to some very imaginative techniques used by Production Designer Ken Adan, Set Designer Syd Cain, and editor Peter Hunt to overcome some of the most complicated set pieces from the script, like the chase and fight sequences in which Hunt’s innovative style of quick cuts, and over bloated sound mixing, would help a great deal, and in scenes like the one in which Dent places a Tarantula in Bond’s room, which was resolved by pinning the bed to a wall, and placing a sheet of protective glass between Connery and the lethal spider, to ensure that no harm would come to the actor.

Back in London, in Pinewood Studios, Ken Adam had already started work on the different sets used throughout the movie, like M’s office, Miss Taro’s apartment and Dr No’s underground lair and laboratory. This last set would prove to be both the most visually striking and, at the same time, the most difficult to recreate. It was mainly due to his work on these sets that Ken Adam would become unavailable for the next picture due to his work on Stanley Kubrick’s Dr Strangelove. Another massive contributor to the production was Special Effects Supervisor John Stears, who would stage the huge explosions in Dr No’s compound seen at the end of the movie.

Final thoughts

As the first movie in the series, the film is played very straight, with some sprinkles of dry humour throughout, that were added by Connery and Young on the fly, to smooth out the overall very prickly and violent tone of the movie. Most of the traits that 007 would become known for, are already there, in some form or another. Connery delivers an astoundingly strong performance for someone with such limited acting experience, and uses both his incredible physiche, charm and dry wit to win audiences over, and make the role his own.

The quick paced editing style of the movie is used to great effect in the action sequences, and the Production and Set Design is remarkable given the limited budget the production had. As for the now iconic sequence in which Honey Ryder emerges from the sea in all her bikini-clad glory, Ursula Andress did really make an impression, and her Honey Ryder would become the model on which many “Bond girls” to come would sculpt their respective roles after. There’s no denying that Terence Young laid the foundations of what James Bond, as a ” bigger than Life”character, would become to be known as, the world over. His direction is precise, even if a bit rough round the edges, but he would more than make up for that in the next entry in the series; From Russia with Love.

Another great contribution to the series was the work of Maurice Binder, in both the title sequence, and the now iconic gun barrel sequence; for which stuntman Bob Simmons, and not Sean Connery, played the role of Bond. Connery would only shoot the sequence for the cinemascope format in Thunderball (1965).

The music is a bit of a controversial area, as there is no definite answer as to who did what for the first movie. Monty Norman is largely credited as the creator of the James Bond theme, but apparently, composer John Barry, had a large part to play in that too. There’s no proper score for the movie, except for the James Bond theme that’s used sporadically throughout, every time Bond is on-screen, and some incidental music of which the theme; Under the Mango tree, is a clear standout. John Barry would only come into his own on the next movie in the series. All in all, a solid start to the franchise, with memorable characters, set-pieces, and some of the best one-liners in the series. Hello, Mr Bond, indeed.

Thanks for reading.

The Witcher. Hit and miss.

One of the most anticipated TV shows of the year has just landed on Netflix. So, is it any good?. Yes, it is. But it isn’t without its flaws.

The Series follows the adventures of Geralt of Rivia, a Witcher, who possesses some magical abilities, is handy with a sword, and it’s also a Monster hunter for hire. He travels the land, breaking curses, hunting magical creatures for money, and making some very interesting acquaintances along the way.

One of the main issues with the show is its uneven pace, quick cut editing, and confusing storytelling, mixing past and present with no proper explanation, or set up, and making the story unnecessarily confusing and convoluted. The story is difficult to follow at first, as it constantly cuts between past and present, without ever establishing the timeline properly, it’s got too many characters, and a main plot line that only becomes entirely clear on the last few episodes. On the plus side, we have a competent cast, the stand-outs being Henry Cavill, as the titular character, and Anya Chalotra, as the powerful mage Yennefer, whose story arc is one of the best things about the show. Its production values are somewhat hit and miss; the locations are used to great effect, and some of the production design, and visual effects work is serviceable, while some of the CGI creatures look a bit iffy, giving some of the shots a cheap look.

That being said, it’s a very entertaining and, at times, funny Sword and Sorcery tale, with some very interesting ideas and episodes; the best being the episodes about the cursed princess and the dragon hunt. I had the impression, watching the show, that its target audience are those who are familiar with the source material, as the number of characters and kingdoms, and story threads surrounding said characters, would be better enjoyed by someone familiar with the character, and his world building. All in all, a very interesting, but somehow irregular TV show that, I’m expecting, will get better on its second season.

Thanks for reading.

The Haunting of Hill House. Family Secrets.

I decided to check out this Netflix TV show, because I became interested in everything that Mike Flannagan, the director of Doctor Sleep had done previous to that movie. And I must say; I’ve been pleasantly surprised. What I’ve seen from his work so far, has done nothing, but confirm what I already suspected; that what he did on Doctor Sleep wasn’t a one-off. His work on The Haunting of Hill House showcases, not only his skill as an accomplished filmmaker, writer and producer, but also as a masterful storyteller.

Based on the 1959 gothic horror novel by Shirley Jackson, which had been previously adapted to the big screen on two occasions, he gives the book a very interesting twist, using the main setting of the novel, The Haunted Hill House, but changing the characters, and adapting them to modern times, turning the story in a cross between a family drama, and a stylised haunted house tale.

Narrated in parallel, in two time periods; the past, in which a family of seven, the Cranes ( Hugh and Olivia Crane, and their five children, Steven, Shirley, Theodora, Nelly and Luke), move into the old and dilapidated titular mansion, in order to renovate, and resale it later at a higher price, discovering, to their surprise, that the old house has more terrible and terrifying secrets that they thought imaginable; and the present, in which the surviving members of that family are still dealing with the consequences of what they experienced inside those walls. What happened inside the House will have dire, and in some cases, tragic consequences for years to come. Supported by a very solid cast, strong scripts, and excellent production values, this is one of the best TV shows I’ve seen this year, and a very welcome surprise. The acting is superb, with a special mention to Carla Cugino, who once again demonstrates what a gifted actress she is. It also has some of the most unsettling and disturbing Horror imagery I’ve seen in some time. The ghosts appearance sequences are brilliantly staged and executed; the crooked neck Lady, and the Tall-floating man, are the stuff of nightmares. No wonder the twin brothers Nell and Luke end up being so psychologically damaged. Extremely creepy. The Cinematography is gorgeous, and the editing extremely inventive. Something that we’re used to from this filmmaker. Attention to episode 6 of the first season, a masterclass in filmmaking and storytelling technique. Excellent.

Thanks for reading.